May 10, 1951
Transcribed by Janette West Grimes
* CAL’S COLUMN *
Tuesday, March 19, 1801
"Court met according to
adjournment. Members present William Walton, Tilman Dixon, Moses Fisk and James
Hibbetts, Esquires." One man present the day before, Peter Turney, was
absent at the beginning of the day's session, although he lived only about two
miles from the place of meeting which was in the old Tilman Dixon home, which
stands just below Dixon's Springs. The two large, two - story rooms with a hall
between, are still to be seen in the old home, to which later, two - story brick rooms were added at each front corner
of the original house. The walls of the original rooms are of log, well hewn
and showing a high grade of workmanship for 150 years ago.
"On motion of George
Smith and John C. Hamilton, Esquires, to grant a new trial in the suit, John L.
Martin versus Michael Murphy; and, on solemn argument heard as well on the part
of the Plaintiff as the Defendant, the Court decided that no new trial be
granted." We presume that George Smith and John C. Hamilton were lawyers.
We have not the least intimation from the old records as to the matter under
litigation. John L. Martin was the Sheriff for 1800, according to the first
matter of business attended to by the Court on the preceeding day, Michael
Murphy was a resident of the present Pleasant Shade section, living just back
of the old Bob Williams Mill. A session of the Court was held at his home in
the year 1800. Anyway a new trial was denied.
"Ordered that Hugh Lamb
be appointed overseer of the road lately laid out from Stephen Copeland's to
where the northern boundary of the State crosses Line Creek, to begin at said
Copeland's to the head of Mill Creek, and that John Overturf be appointed
overseer from the head of Mill Creek to the Cumberland River, and that Moses
Fisk, Esquire, be appointed to furnish overseers with a list of hands. And that
John Black be appointed overseer from Cumberland River to where the northern
boundary of the State crosses Line Creek, and that all the hands living above
the waters of Jennings' Creek on the north side of the Cumberland River work
under said overseer." Two or three points in this are not clear. One is
concerning Hugh Lamb. It is to hard make out whether this is the correct name,
as the writing is hard to decipher. Whether this is correct will have to wait
further action and more legible handwriting. Stephen Copeland lived somewhere
in the present Clay County from the best information we have. We know that Line
Creek leaves the present Macon County about a mile south of the present Gamabel
(?), in the extreme northeast corner of the county. So this must have been one
end of the road, and Copeland's home at the other end. We do not know where
Mill Creek of the Cumberland is. According to the above item it appears that
there was some sort of overlapping of overseers. It appears that the road
wherever it began and wherever it ended, was somewhere north of the waters of
Jennings' Creek, judging from the latter part of the Court's order. We know
that Jennings' Creek rises in the east end of the present Macon County and that
it drains a large area of hills and valleys. The next stream up the Cumberland
above Jennings' Creek is known as Locke's Branch now, Brimstone is another
creek, but we have no knowledge of Mill Creek of Cumberland River.
"Ordered that Harmon
Grags (?) be appointed overseer of the road lately laid off by John McDonald,
Simon Huddleston and John Morgan, to begin on the South bank of Obed's River,
to the top of the Ridge at the head of Eagle Creek, and that all the hands
living between Irons (?) road and the Indian Boundary on the South side of
Obed's River work under said overseer. And that George Smith be appointed
overseer of the said road from the North bank of Obed's River to the State line
and that the hands ( work said road ) living within the following bounds:
Beginning where the State line crosses Spring Creek, thence a direct line to
the Indian Boundary and along same to where it intersects the Northern boundary
of the State and North along the same to the beginning." Here is a rather
long item, part of which is not clear. We doubt if the name at the beginning
"Harmon Grags," is correct, as we made our record for this article
from the copy which is in the State Library and not directly from the old
records themselves. In other words, we believe a mistake was made by the party
copying the old records for the Library. The South bank of Obed's River meant
the right - hand bank of the stream as one ascends the little river. Where
Eagle Creek is, we do not know. Perhaps some reader can tell us. We suppose it
is a stream running into Obed's River from the south or southeast. The Indian
Boundary, as has already been set forth in a previous article, embraced a large
territory extending from the Kentucky line southward to the present Caney Fork
River and eastward, we suppose, to the Cumberland Mountains. It took in the
upper part of Obed's River, which the Indians called
"Ooccoahustehee." How long it was continued as a reservation for the
Cherokee Indians is not known to the writer.
The George Smith appointed
overseer on the north side of Obed's River may have been the same George Smith,
referred to as probably an attorney or lawyer. We confess our ignorance in this
matter.
"In the suit, Jordan
Roach against Lazarus Cotton, on motion of defendant attorney for a new trial
in the above suit, and solemn argument heard as well on behalf of the Plaintiff
as the Defendent, the Court decided that a new trial be granted." We do
not know who Jordan Roach was, the name, so far as we know, being no longer
known among Smith County citizens. Lazarus Cotton was previously mentioned in
one item of business in the year 1800. What the suit embraced we do not know.We
wish we had a record of the early suits but that is only wishful longing.
"Ordered that in the
suit, John L. Martin against Michael Murphy, all the costs which accrued in the
above suit by summoning witnesses who have not attended, together with the cost
of issuing such subpoenas, be taxed on the Plaintiff." Here we learn that
Martin, the Plaintiff, was taxed with the costs of issuing subpoenas and of the
officers summoning of witnesses who did not appear. We are certain that
summoning witnesses was a hard job in that day and time where there were no
real roads and the onlu means of travel was on horseback or on foot. Just think
of summoning witnesses over Smith County which at that time embraced a strip of
land extended from Sumner and Wilson Counties on the west to the Indian
Boundary on the east and from Kentucky on the north to Alabama on the south.
"Peter Turney and
Armistead Stubblefield, Caviators against Willis Cherry, Cavitee, on motion of
Defendant attorney: to set aside the jury who attended upon the premises, and
to order a new Jury to be summoned, the Court overruled the motion and
confirmed the verdict of said Jury." Armistead Stubblefield is supposed to
have been the ancestor of the Stubblefields of Hartsville, or at least a
relative of theirs. The words, "Caviators," and "Cavitee,"
are incorrectly spelled, and we are not trying to appear smart. The first word
is correctly spelled "Caveator." We find no word answering for the
latter word, "Cavitee." "Caveat" means in law; A formal
notification to a court or ministerial officer warning him from taking some
particular step till the notifier is heard; a caution; warning; as, a caveat
filed against the probate of a will." We would say that in the above Peter
Turney and Armistead filed a caveat against Willis Cherry, but just what was
involved is not set forth at all. We have no knowledge whatever of who Willis
Cherry was. The word Caveat really means, "Let him beware."
"In the suit, John
Sevier and George Gordon against Aaron Robbins, Benjamin Seawell, Esquire,
moved to amend the Declaration in Ejectment. The Court determined that no
amendments should be made and that the suit abate accordingly by the agreement
of the Plaintiff's attorney." Seawell was an early lawyer. We presume his
name would now be spelled Sewell. John Sevier and George Gordon were large land
owners in those early days, and it appears that an effort was being made to
"eject" one Aaron Robbins from property claimed or owned by Sevier
and Gordon. In Seawell 's effort to amend the Declaration in Ejectment, the
Court ruled against the Plaintiffs. We have no idea who Aaron Robbins was, this
being the first time, if memory serves us aright, that the name has appeared in
the old records of a century and a half ago.
"Ordered that Moses
Fisk, Esquire, and Sampson Williams be appointed to survey a disputed claim wherein George Gordon and John Sevier
are Plaintiffs, and Alexander Suite, Defendant; the said surveyors to meet on
the 11th of April next at thre house of John Sprowls, and that the Plaintiff's
be directed to furnish said surveyors with all the title papers to establish
their claim." Reference has been made numerous times to Gordon and Sevier.
Also we had some comment to offer about Alexander Suite, who, we suppose, was
very probably the father of Elder William N. Suite a Baptist minister at a later period. The future
minister was born in October 21, 1825, and lost his father while he was perhaps
in his teens. He was a resident of the extreme west end of Smith County, on the
south side of Cumberland River. If the writer should be in error as to
Alexander Suite being the father of Elder William N. Suite, we would be glad to
be corrected. We believe that some previous reference to John Sprowls has
already been made in these articles.
"Ordered that the
following Gentlemen be appointed on the Venire to the Superior Court: viz:
Andrew Greer, Daniel Mungle, David Cochran and Edward Settles." Comment
has already been offered on each of these early citizens.
"A Venire for the
ensuing County Court: viz: Thomas Draper, James Draper, Henry Huddleston, Lee
Sullivan, William Sullivan, William Anderson, Uriah Anderson, John Fitzgerald,
Christopher Fuller, William Robertson, Willeroy Pate, Edward Pate, Booker Pate,
James Roberts, Isaac Green, Jacob Bowerman, Charles McClennan, William
Marchbanks, William Kelton, Elijah Hedgecock, John Steel, Nathaniel Ridley,
Thomas Keaton, Henry McKinney, Charles Carter, Thomas Williamson, Esom Graves,
Jacob Jenkins, George Ausbrooks, James Fisher, James Armstrong, Thomas Wallace,
Henry Sadler, William Holliday, George Leeper and Benjamin Holliday." Here
we have a list that included some of the leading Smith County citizens in 1801.
We have offered comment on practically all the number. We are still in the dark
as to Lee and William Sullivan. Were they related to our present Sullivans in
Macon County ? We also would like to know what connection there was between,
Willeroy, Edward and Booker Pate. William and Uriah Anderson claim an interest
in our inquiries. Were they brothers ? Did either of them have a son, Johnson
Anderson, who married Dillie, the daughter of our great - great - grandfather,
Jerry Gregory and his wife, Barbara Rawls ? We believe that there are two news
names in the list, those of Elijah Hedgecock and Thomas Wallace. If we have
found them in the records prior to March Court in 1801, we do not recall same.
We also believe that William and Benjamin Holliday "newcomers" to
these records. We wonder if George Leeper
was related to the Leeper family that previously settled at Nashville.
We also wonder if the Holliday mentioned above were related to the Holliday who
had lived with Thomas S. Spencer for a time, at Castalian Springs, who wished to return to the old settlement
and who was accompanied to some part of Kentucky where the two men parted,
after they had broken the one hunting knife they owned and each had taken a
part of the knife as they separated.
"Ordered that Moses
Fisk, Grant Allen and Peter Turney, Esquires, be appointed to settle with the
administrators of the estate of William Young, deceased, that they report such
settlement together with the vouchers relative thereto, to our ensuing Court." We believe we have mentioned
the fact that Grant Allen lived near the mouth of Dixon's Creek, but we may
have not reported that fact previously. He was connected with the early history
of Dixon's Creek Baptist church, which was formed in Allen's home on March 8,
1800, a year before the Court which
this article is a part of the record. There was also a preacher named Clifton
Allen, in that distant day and time, but whether he was a brother of Grant
Allen, we are not informed. Anyway, Clifton Allen was not of the ministerial
members of the organizing Presbytery that formed that church on March 8, 1800.
We might add that the church is still very much alive today, and most of her
records are intact. We do not know who the administrators of the estate of
William Young were, although there may have been some reference thereto in the
old records that have already been given. It is hard to remember all that one
would like to recall.
"Pleasant Kearby and
wife versus Philip Draper and wife. On motion of Defendants' attorney, the
above suit abated on the pleas of the defendants." Pleasant Kearby is believed
to have been the ancestor of the
numerous Kirby family of the present day in Macon and Smith Counties. We have
no knowledge of Philip Draper, nor the nature of the suit.
"Ordered that the fine
and double tax incurred on 640 acres of and lying on Roaring River be remitted
for the year 1800. This vague and indefinite record lacks the name of the land
owner. It also looks like there was no other land on Roaring River except the
640 acres but we know that this is incorrect. It was another example of the sad
act that our ancestors kept but few records and many of them kept none at all.
Tracing family history, today is an almost hopeless task because our people in
the long gone years kept but few records and some did not keep any.
"Ordered William Russell,
James Taylor, Smith Hutchins, John ( unreadable ), John M. Roberts, John
Burlison, Isham Russell and Stephen Capeland be appointed a Jury to view, mark
and lay off a road, agreeable to law, from or near the head of Eagle Creek,
where the road lately marked by John McDonald and others stops, to intersect
the Fort Blount Road at the most convenient place for the Roaring River
settlement, and that they report the same to our ensuing Court." Here we
have two or three new names. Isham Russell, Smith Hutchinson and John Burlison
are all here mentioned in the old records for the first time, so far as we can
recall. We have absolutely no knowledge of either of them as to ancestors or
posterity. We believe Eagle Creek is a stream running into Obed's River from
the South. The Fort Blount road began at Fort Blount, now in Jackson County,
and extended many miles westward. So it appears that the new road was to be
laid off from the vicinity of Obed's River or its waters southward by way of
Roaring River, which empties into the Cumberland just above the present
Gainesboro.
"Ordered that Silas
Jernigan, Peter Turney, Tilman Dixon, Nathaniel Dickerson and Moses Fisk be
appointed a Jury to view, mark and lay off a road, agreeable to law, from Dixon
Springs to Peter Turneys' and that they report same to our ensuing Court."
Here we have an item of
peculiar interest to the writer. Here we find the viewing, marking and "
laying off of the first road Cal ever traveled to get to the town nearest to
where he was born. For Peter Turney lived in the same valley in which Cal was
born almost 80 years ago. Previous to the above order of the Court the old Fort
Blount road came down the same valley, but turned to the northeast very
near the Peter Turney home, crossed Dixon's Creek just below the present brick
church house on that stream, thence across the hills toward Hartsville, by
passing Dixon Springs by a distance of nearly two miles. So a road was planned
directly from Dixon Springs to Turney's home. No doubt this road intersected
with the Fort Blount Road in less than a half mile of the old Turney home,
which was on the present Bud Garrett farm. One new name appears in the list of
jurors appointed for the laying out of the road, that of Nathaniel Dickerson.
We have no knowledge whatever of him and any information will be appreciated.
We might add that the above proposed new road, so far
as the writer can learn, largely followed the bed of Dixon's Creek to the mouth
of the present Young Branch, which was known in 1801 as the East Fork of
Dixon's Creek. Turney lived on the East Fork, about a mile from where it
empties into Dixon's Creek. Later the road was moved away from the Creek in
places, extending by the old Duffy place, now the home of Mrs. Ella Phillips,
thence to a ford in Dixon's Creek, now replaced by a steel bridge and eastward
to Turney's place.
Scores of memories for Cal
cluster about that old road. We used to take it when we went fishing, we
followed it on our first visit to Dixon Springs, which occurred when we were
only about nine years old. It was on this road our father traveled to the
stores at Dixon's Springs and over it came most of the sugar, coffee and other
groceries of our childhood. It was on this road that our father's old mare,
Dinah, kicked the "stuffing " out of the headlight on the early
automobile many years ago and which we have already reported in our Column. It
was at the ford above mentioned that our father had to leap from the wagon and
hold up the head of the mare that fell over the wagon tongue while trying to
put down the hind foot with which she had sought to dislodge a fly on her neck
and which got bad caught in the check line between the harness and the mare's
mouth. Our father, "Pappie," to the writer, did not like water any too
well and that early spring day while the water was still cold, he leaped into
the water nearly waist deep and held up the mare's head until his brother cut
the gear or harness and saved her life. Our brother Tom and the writer asked at
almost the same time, on learning of the upset, "Why didn't you let the
old fool drown ?" Our father's answer comes back to us over 40 years of
time, "You ain't got a bit of sense." And we see now the silliness of
our question, but we were disgusted
with that old foolish, silly mare and did not much care if she drown.
"Ordered that Court
adjourn to Fort Blount until Court in course Sampson Williams." Here we
find the end of a session of only two days. The previous Courts had lasted
three full days.
( To
be continued )