|
It cannot be a matter of doubt that Colonel Arthur Campbell took
an active part in encouraging and aiding the people living in the
territory ceded by North Carolina in June, 1784, to form a separate
and independent government. He saw in the act of cession an
opportunity to carry into execution his favorite plan for a new
State including the Southwest Virginia and East Tennessee counties.
Campbell attended one or both of the conventions held at
Jonesborough, in furtherance of his scheme. "It is notoriously known
that Col. Campbell did, in a convention of the North Carolina
people, publicly propose to separate himself with the citizens of
Washington and Montgomery in Virginia; and, joining them, declare
themselves independent of the States of Virginia and North Carolina;
moreover to stand in the front of battle between these people and
Virginia when necessary. The charges herein contained can be
supported by General Russell, Captain Andrew Kincannon, and Captain
Wm. Cocke of the Franklin Settlement."1
Martin wrote to Henry: "Col. Campbell made use of many arguments to
draw me over to that [the Franklin] party . . . as it would be much
to my interest, as I had a body of valuable lands in Powell's
Valley; that as soon as the new State would take place, I might have
a county laid off and the court-house on my land and convenient to
the seat of government. My reply to him was that as long as I
appeared in public character, I did not look altogether at private
interest; that I was in every sense of the word against a new
State."2
On his return from Franklin to his home, Campbell began an agitation
in favor of joining the fortunes of the contiguous part of Virginia
with those of the promoters of Franklin. A large element of the
people in Southwest Virginia was ripe for action. General Russell
and his friends at this time had the ear of the governor in respect
to State appointments, rather than the Campbell faction.
One of the complaints of the Western Virginians, not dissimilar to
that put forward by the Western Carolinians, was that they were
excessively taxed and received no adequate governmental benefits in
return. Campbell contended that two million dollars more than was
justly due had been collected from the inhabitants of his county;
and he urged resistance to further payments on days when, as chief
judge in his county, he held county court. Rev. Charles Cummings,
who had been a member of the committee of safety organized in his
county in revolutionary days and who was a leader among the
Presbyterians of his section, appealed to his people to stand for
their rights; and he presided at meetings held to advance
separation. At one of these gatherings there was set on foot a
memorial to Congress asking for the establishment of an independent
government. This must have been some time before January 1, 1785,
since the document was read in Congress January 13, 1785. It was
signed by many leading Virginians on the Holston waters; and, it is
interesting to note, by Gilbert Christian, John Anderson, David
Looney and John Adair, residents of Sullivan county, across the
state line. Concert of action on the part of the two peoples is
evident. The connecting link was Arthur Campbell. His was the master
mind that moulded the MEMORIAL
To the Honorable Congress
of the
United States of America. The Memorial of the freemen inhabiting the county westward of the
Alleghany or Appalachian mountain, and southward of the Ouasioto,
humbly showeth:
That having been made acquainted with the several Resolves and other
Acts of Congress respecting the Western Territory, and having
considered maturely the contents of the same, we are highly pleased
with that equal respect to the liberties of the people which seems
to induce the councils of Congress. That nothing but a firm
adherence to the principles of the Confederation, and a sacred
regard for the rights of mankind could produce the late resolves for
laying off independent States, thereby pointing out such effectual
measures to prevent the encroachment of arbitrary power in the
asylums of freedom.
Next we are happy to find so large a part of territory already ceded
to the United States for national purposes, and trust that every
obstacle will speedily be removed for the completion of that
business by the individual States effected thereby. That we are too
much elated at the prospect before us not to wish that we very
speedily enjoy the advantages of such government as will be
exercised over a convenient territory, not too small for the support
of authority, nor too large for the security of freedom.
That our situation is such, inhabiting valleys intermixed with and
environed by vast wilds of barren and inaccessible mountains, that
the same compensation of latitude allotted to the new States
northwest of the Ohio might prevent us from ever being on an equal
footing with our neighbors, blessed with so many natural advantages,
navigable waters, and a level, fertile country.
That a State bounded by a meridian line that will touch the
confluence of Little River near Ingles Ferry, thence down Kanawha to
the Roncovert or Green Briar River, thence southwest to latitude 37
degrees north, thence along the same to the meridian of the Rapids
of the Ohio, south along the meridian until it reaches the Tennessee
or Cherokee River, down the same to the part nearest latitude 34
degrees, 'south to the same, and eastwardly on that parallel to the
top of the Appalachian mountains, and along the heights that divide
the sources of the waters that fall into the Mississippi from those
that empty into the Atlantic to the beginning. This, though not
equal in quantity of habitable lands with the adjoining States, yet
may be sufficient territory for a society that wishes to encourage
industry and temperance as cardinal virtues.
That in our present settlement we have maintained our ground during
the late perilous war, and frequently gave effectual aid to our
brethren to the south and eastward; that we are first occupants and
aborigines of this country; freemen claiming natural rights, and the
privileges of American citizens.
Our prayer, therefore, is, that your Honourable Body, with a
generous regard to the rights of mankind, would speedily erect the
aforesaid described Territory into a free and Independent State,
subject to the federal bond, and likewise confirm and guarantee to
the inhabitants all their equitable rights and privileges acquired
under the laws of the States lately claiming this territory; that
the disposition of the vacant lands be under the power of the
Legislature of the new State, in as full a manner as that exercised
by such Eastern States having unappropriated lands, with this
reservation, that the monies arising from the sale of vacant lands
shall be faithfully paid to the order of Congress, towards the
payment of the national debt.
And your memorialists shall ever pray, &c.
Approved and subscribed by us, in behalf of ourselves and the.
freemen of our respective districts, who we represent.
| Charles Cummins,
Chairman, |
|
| John Campbell |
John Kincaid, |
| John Jameson, |
Arthur Campbell, |
| Robt. Buchanan, |
Thos. Woolsey, |
| Alexander Wiley, |
John Campbell, S'n'r., |
| William Tate, |
Richard Brownlow, |
| George Finley |
John Davis, |
| Mathew Willoughby, |
|
| Gilbert Christian, |
|
| John Anderson, |
|
| David Looney, |
|
| John Adair. |
|
Campbell's enthusiasm for a new government was, at this time, great.
He was asked by an opponent: "If the State of North Carolina were to
send a force against the Franklin people to subject them to
obedience to the government of North Carolina, whether he would be
willing to give them aid, meaning the Franklin people? On which he
answered, by all means we ought, if we expect to share with them the
benefits of government."3
Turner says:4 "Again, in the spring of 1785, another
petition went to Congress from the deputies of the same county. They
proposed modifications in the rigid rectangles that Jefferson had
laid down for the western States in the Ordinance of 1784. The
eastern meridian lines, they complained, passed across a great
number of the most inaccessible and craggy mountains in America; and
severed communities naturally one. The western meridian divided the
Kentucky settlers. They proposed two States with natural boundary
lines: the Kentucky settlements bounded by the Great Kanawha were to
make one, and the upper waters of the Tennessee, including the
Muscle Shoals of that river, another. The Cumberland settlers would
have been left as a nucleus of another State provided for by the
Ordinance of 1784. As thus modified, the settlers declared the
Ordinance the basis for liberal and beneficial compact. With this
petition they forwarded an association which they had drawn up,
resolving, among other things, that the lands cultivated by
individuals belong strictly to them, and not to the government;
otherwise every citizen would be a tenant and not a landlord, a
vassal and not a freeman; and every government would be a
usurpation, not an instrumental device for public good."5
Their conception of their rights differed materially from the view
expressed by Governor Alex. Martin in opposing a cession by North
Carolina in 1783: "For cogent is the reasoning, when we can with
great truth say: our own blood was spilt in acquiring land for our
own settlement, our fortunes expended in making these settlements
effectual; for ourselves we fought, for ourselves we conquered, and
for ourselves alone we have a right to hold."
The two peoples, on the Holston in Virginia and those of Franklin,
were animated by the spirit of independence; and they sought from
the beginning the guardianship of the Congress of the
Confederation.6 Alike they refer in their resolutions to the
Ordinance of 1784 for justification, though both saw the
impracticability of its provision for rectangular States. They had
experienced the inconvenience of being severed by an arbitrary line
of latitude—that dividing Virginia and Carolina—and even that line
they would disregard, if Congress could be brought to approve.
The boundaries for the new State at the South named in this petition
differed somewhat from the earlier ones:
The "State to the South will include the inhabitants on the heads of
Kanawha and Cherokee [Tennessee] rivers, to be bounded by a line
extended due South from that part of Cumberland river where the
meridian line drawn from the mouth of Salt river will touch it,
until it reaches Elk river, down that river to the Tenasee, thence
South [easterly] to the top of Appalachian mountain, eastwardly
along same to a point from whence a north line extended would meet
the Kanawha at the mouth of Little river near Ingles' Ferry; and
down that river to the Ronceverte [Greenbriar], westwardly along the
boundary as above described for the Kentucky Country.
"At this day, we find a new Society forming itself back of North
Carolina, which, if the requisition of Congress of the twenty-ninth day of April last is regarded, we of course will
be annexed to; and the natural situation of the country points out
the connection; but we are yet restrained from formally joining them
by a deference to the opinion of those who bear rule in Virginia,
and the want of an orderly accession to Independence under the
auspices of Congress. These obstacles, we confide, the rulers of the
Federal Government will remove. The interest of America seems
urgently to call for it, and the peace and prosperity of the western
inhabitants will no longer admit of delay."
This well-phrased resolution of the deputies of Washington county,
Virginia, was signed by Chas. Cummings, as chairman.
A formal remonstrance7 was lodged against Campbell with the governor
and council of state, by the Russell faction; learning of which
Campbell wrote Governor Henry (July 26,1785):
"We are told (but it is only from report) that we have offended the
government on account of our sentiments being favorable to a new
State, and our looking forward to a separation. If such a
disposition is criminal, I confess that there is not a few in this
county to whom guilt may be imputed, and to many respectable
characters in other counties on the Western Waters. If we wish for a
separation, it is on account of grievances that daily become more
and more intolerable; it is from the hope that another mode of
governing will make us more useful than we now are to the general
Confederacy, or ever can be, whilst so connected. But why can blame
fall on us when our aim is to conduct measures in an orderly manner,
and strictly consistent with the Constitution? Surely men who have
bound themselves by every holy tie to support republican principles,
cannot, on a dispassionate consideration, blame us. Our want of
experience and knowledge may be a plea against us. We deplore our
circumstances and situation on that account. But, sir, why may we
not take courage and say we are right when adverting to our own
Constitution, to the different Acts of Congress, that of different
Legislatures, the opinions of the best statesmen in America, among
whom we can number an illustrious Commander, a great Lawyer and
Judge in this State, and a Governor of Virginia himself." 8
Campbell's activity for a separation gave no little concern to the
leading statesmen of Virginia. Richard Henry Lee wrote from Congress
to Madison (May 3o, 1785) favoring the grant of self- government to
the Kentucky people, since they would remain for a long time "more
expense than profit to the rest of the country. Washington county
seems to be stimulated by a troublesome person who for
self-aggrandizement appears to be willing to dismember that part
also, and join with the revolters from North Carolina. This last
seems to merit the wise and firm attention of the government and the
legislature."9
Governor Henry had written an account of the Franklin proceedings to
the Virginia delegates in Congress; and Col. Martin had notified
Henry that a firm hand would be shown by the North Carolina
government toward the Franklinites in her western counties.10 This in
reply to an inquiry from Henry: "Let me hear from you how the Overhill Carolina folks go on."11
Under these influences, Governor Henry issued a proclamation of
warning (June 10) to the "freemen of Washington county."
By the summer of 1785, Campbell deemed it unwise to cooperate
directly any longer with the other projectors of the State of
Franklin.12 Governor Sevier evidently noted his change of
attitude; and thought it good diplomacy to court the favor of
Virginia, with a view to changing the position of her delegation in
Congress in respect to a recognition of the State of Franklin. On
July 19, 1785, Sevier wrote to Henry:
"Having an opportunity to send a letter to Gen. Russell's from
whence I expect it can be forwarded to your Excellency, I take the
liberty of writing to you. The people of the Western Waters in No.
Carolina, for many reasons too long to trouble you with, have formed
themselves in a new State by the name of Franklin, and have
appointed me their Governor . . . I will beg leave to mention to
your Excellency that I am taking every measure in my power to
prevent encroachment on the Indians' lands. This, however, is a
difficult task, because North Carolina actually sold the lands up to
their towns. I have fixed a temporary line as far as the people have
settled, and none shall settle over it until it can be done by
mutual agreement. Although we have been forced into necessary
measures for separation from North Carolina, I think it is necessary
to inform you that we will, on no account, encourage any part of the
people of your State to join us, nor will we receive any of them
unless by consent of your State. We reverence the Virginians, and I
am confident the Legislature here will, at all times, do everything
to merit your esteem. Congress have again called upon No. Carolina
to confirm the cession which they unwisely withdrew, and I believe a
majority of the people in Carolina are in our favor. I do not expect
your Excellency to correspond with us until our government is
recognized by Congress; but in the meanwhile you may rely we shall
do everything in our power to contribute to the welfare of all our
neighboring States as well as our own cause. And we hope to convince
them all that we are not banditti, but people who mean to do right,
as far as our knowledge will lead us."13
Governor Henry on the convening of the Assembly of Virginia, sent in
the following message on the subject:
"I transmit herewith a letter from the Honorable Mr. Hardy, covering
a memorial to Congress from sundry inhabitants of Washington county,
praying the establishment of an independent State to be bounded as
therein expressed. The proposed limits include a vast extent of
country, in which we have numerous and very respectable settlements,
which, in their growth, will form an invaluable barrier between this
country and those, who, in the course of events, may occupy the vast
places westward of the mountains, some of whom have views
incompatible with our safety. Already the militia of that part of
the country is the most respectable we have, and by their means it
is that the neighboring Indians are awed into professions of
friendship. But a circumstance has lately happened which renders the
possession of the territory at the present time indispensable to the
peace and safety of Virginia. I mean the assumption of sovereign
power by the western inhabitants of North Carolina. If the people
who, without consulting their own safety, or any other authority
known in the American Constitution, have assumed government, and
while unallied to us, and under no engagements to pursue the objects
of the federal government, shall be strengthened by the accession of
so great a part of our country, consequences fatal to our repose
will probably follow. It is to be observed, that the settlements of
this new society stretch into a great extent in contact with ours in
Washington county, and thereby expose our citizens to the contagion
of the example which bids fair to destroy the peace of North
Carolina. In this state of things it is, that variety of information
has come to me, stating that several persons, but especially Col.
Arthur Campbell, have used their utmost endeavors, and, with some
success, to persuade the citizens in that quarter to break off from
this Commonwealth, and attach themselves to the newly assumed
government, or to erect one distinct from us. And to effect this
purpose, the equality and authority of the laws have been arraigned,
the collection of the taxes impeded, and our national character
impeached. If this most important part of our territory be lopped
off, we lose that barrier for which our people have long and often
fought; that nursery of soldiers from which future armies may be
levied, and through which it will be almost impossible for our
enemies to penetrate. We shall aggrandize the new State, whose
connections, views and designs we know not; shall cease to be
formidable to our savage neighbors, or respectable to our western
settlements, at present or in the future.
"Whilst these and many other matters were contemplated by the
Executive, it is natural to suppose the attempt at separation was
discouraged by every lawful means, the chief of which was displacing
such of the field officers of the militia in Washington county as
were active partizans for separation, in order to prevent the weight
of office being put in the scale against Virginia. To this end a
proclamation was issued, declaring the militia laws of the last
session in force in that country, and appointments were made
agreeable to them. I hope to be excused for expressing a wish that
the Assembly, in deliberating on this affair, will prefer lenient
measures, in order to reclaim our erring citizens. Their taxes have
run into three years and have thereby grown into an amount beyond
the ability of many to discharge; while the system of our trade has
been such as to render their agriculture unproductive of money. And
I cannot but suppose, that even the warmest supporters of separation
had seen the mischievous consequences, they would have retraced, and
considered that intemperance in their own proceedings, which
opposition in sentiment is too apt to produce."14
The Assembly determined to adopt vigorous measures to check
the separation movement in the southwestern counties, and passed an
act in the fall of 1785, by which it was declared to be high treason
to erect, without authority of the Assembly, an independent
government within the limits of the State.15 But conciliatory steps
were also taken. Governor Henry had appointed Gen. William Russell
as head of the western militia instead of Campbell, but when Edmund
Randolph succeeded Henry in the governorship, Campbell was
reinstated and again in ascendency. Col. Joseph Martin lost his
office as Indian agent shortly after this change in administration.
Haywood states that Campbell drafted a constitution for the new
State proposed by him, in which the boundaries were set forth with
more particularity. Nothing but the "declaration of rights" of this
instrument remains."
Colonel Arthur Campbell doubtless felt that he was compelled by
circumstances to give over his pet project and turn undivided
attention to the defense of himself against his enemies before the
Virginia Assembly. He was there deprived of his office; but he
grimly fought on. The succeeding administration and General Assembly
(1787) were favorable to him, and an act was passed 17 declaring the former legislative action to be void because
unconstitutional, in that it trenched on judicial power. Campbell
resumed the performance of the duties of the office, and William Edmiston prosecuted a qui tam action against him, but
lost.18
___________
1 Charges preferred against Campbell by James Montgomery and others,
July 25, 1785. Va. Cal. State Papers, IV, 45.
2 Martin to Governor Henry (Va. Cal. St. Papers, 53). Martin must
have assumed that Campbell was in ignorance of the former's
Tennessee Bend purchase of the Cherokees while he was under the
trust relation of agent to those Indians.
3 Deposition of Andrew Kincannon, May 3, 1786, for use in the trial
of Arthur Campbell for misconduct in office. Cal. Va. St. Papers,
IV, 116.
4 Turner, "Western State-Making in the Revolutionary Era," American
Historical Review, I, 260; Archives, Continental Congress, No. 48,
pp. 281, 289, 297.
5 Turner: "They are here using the language of
Jefferson's Proposed Instructions to the Virginia Delegates, 1774.
Ford's Jefferson' s Writings, I, 437."
6 There is no basis in fact for the opinion expressed by Allison
(Dropped Stitches, 3o) that "in the beginning they [the Franklinites
did not intend to join the Union of the States, but that later they conduded they would" Here again, a stitch is dropped rather than
picked up. The first resolution passed contained a reference to the
resolves of Congress and to the sending of a commissioner to the
national legislature.
7 The Humble Remonstrances of the Captains of Washington county
(1785) charging that Campbell was "artful in having a majority of
the court favorers of his proceedings for a new State." Va. Mag.
Hist. and Biog., XVII, 165.
8 Cal. Va. St. Papers, IV, 44.
9 Letters of R. H. Lee, II, 364.
10 Cal. Va. St. Papers, III, 292 (April 16, 1785).11
11 Ib., IV, 18 (March 26, 1785) and 25 (April 17, 1785).
12 Henry to Martin, Feb. 4, 1785.
13 Roosevelt erroneously states that Campbell
acknowledged that he became a member of the privy council of the
State of Franklin under Governor Sevier.
14
Cal. Va. St. Papers, IV, 34.
15 Cal. Va. St. Papers, IV , 42.
16 Haywood, 320. See Summers, History of Southwest Virginia, 400,
for the declaration of rights. Haywood gives the boundaries as
follows:
"Beginning at a point on the top of the Alleghany or Appalachian
mountains, so as a line drawn due north from there will touch the
bank of New River, otherwise called Kanawha, at the confluence of
Little river, which is about one mile above Ingle's ferry; down the
said river Kanawha to the mouth of Rencovert, or Green Briar river;
a direct line thence to the nearest summit of Laurel mountain, and
along the highest part of same to the point where it is intersected
by the parallel of thirty- seven degrees of north latitude; west
along that latitude to a point where it is met by a meridian line
that passes through the lower part of the rapid of Ohio; south along
the meridian to Elk river, a branch of the Tennessee; down said
river to its mouth, and down the Tennessee to the most southwardly
part or bend in said river; a direct line from thence to that branch
of the Mobile river called Donbigbee, to its junction with the
Coosawatee river, to the mouth of that branch of it called the
Hightower; thence south to the top of the Appalachian mountain, or
the highest land that divides the sources of the eastern from the
western waters; northwardly, along the middle of said heights, and
the top of the Appalachian mountain, to the beginning." The name of
the commonwealth was to be Franklin, or Frankland. This grand
project reached out for the much-sought territory in the Great Bend
of Tennessee river, and also included lands lower down on which
Colonel Joseph Martin had fixed his heart.
17 Hening's Statutes, XII, 41.
18 Edmiston vs. Campbell, I Va. Cases, 16. The
constitutional question was of so much importance that the case was
abstracted in Tucker's Blackstone's Commentaries, I, 125. |